Unraveling the Logic of ASEAN's Decision-Making: Theoretical Analysis and Case Examination

Yi-hung Chiou*

*Corresponding author for this work

研究成果: Article同行評審

1 引文 斯高帕斯(Scopus)


Throughout its history, the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) has based decisions on consensus and consultation, producing a loosely defined, weak regional organization. The results of nonbinding and watered-down resolutions make substantial progress for ASEAN difficult. This article explores the logic of ASEAN's decision-making by applying rational choice theory. It argues that the characteristics of ASEAN's decision-making mechanism allow member states to base their actions on how individual nations perceive their interests to be best served by group resolutions. By constructing a series of hypotheses to pattern ASEAN's decision-making, this article examines four cases and how players resolved each. The findings suggest that the constraints of group decision-making and divergent interests between member states play a major role in shaping the effectiveness of resolutions.

頁(從 - 到)371-393
期刊Asian Politics and Policy
出版狀態Published - 1 七月 2010

指紋 深入研究「Unraveling the Logic of ASEAN's Decision-Making: Theoretical Analysis and Case Examination」主題。共同形成了獨特的指紋。