Comparison of Two Ambient Beta Gauge PM10 Samplers

Chuen-Tinn Tsai*, Yu Hsiang Cheng

*Corresponding author for this work

研究成果: Article

13 引文 斯高帕斯(Scopus)

摘要

This paper reports on the performance of the Kimoto 180 sampler and the Wedding ambient PM10 beta gauge sampler. Monodisperse ammonium fluorescein test particles were generated in the laboratory and used to determine the penetration curve of the Kimoto 180 cyclonic inlet. It was found that the actual DpaSOof the Kimoto 180 inlet, 3.5 (xm, is much lower than the designated standard value, 10 um. In the field test, the two beta gauge samplers were collocated with an Andersen SA1200 high-volume sampler to compare their measured daily average PM10 concentrations. The low Dpa50 of the Kimoto 180 inlet serves to explain why its daily average PM10 concentrations were much lower than the actual PM10 concentrations found in the field study. In addition, the PM10 concentrations of the Kimoto 180 beta gauge sampler were found to be seriously affected by the water vapor content of the ambient air. In contrast, the daily average PM10 concentrations of the Wedding beta gauge sampler were found to be more accurate, and influences by ambient conditions were insignificant

原文English
頁(從 - 到)142-147
頁數6
期刊Journal of the Air and Waste Management Association
46
發行號2
DOIs
出版狀態Published - 1 二月 1996

指紋 深入研究「Comparison of Two Ambient Beta Gauge PM10 Samplers」主題。共同形成了獨特的指紋。

  • 引用此