A comparative appraisal of two equivalence tests for multiple standardized effects

Gwowen Shieh*

*Corresponding author for this work

研究成果: Article同行評審

3 引文 斯高帕斯(Scopus)


Equivalence testing is recommended as a better alternative to the traditional difference-based methods for demonstrating the comparability of two or more treatment effects. Although equivalent tests of two groups are widely discussed, the natural extensions for assessing equivalence between several groups have not been well examined. This article provides a detailed and schematic comparison of the ANOVA F and the studentized range tests for evaluating the comparability of several standardized effects. Power and sample size appraisals of the two grossly distinct approaches are conducted in terms of a constraint on the range of the standardized means when the standard deviation of the standardized means is fixed. Although neither method is uniformly more powerful, the studentized range test has a clear advantage in sample size requirements necessary to achieve a given power when the underlying effect configurations are close to the priori minimum difference for determining equivalence. For actual application of equivalence tests and advance planning of equivalence studies, both SAS and R computer codes are available as supplementary files to implement the calculations of critical values, p-values, power levels, and sample sizes.

頁(從 - 到)110-117
期刊Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
出版狀態Published - 1 四月 2016

指紋 深入研究「A comparative appraisal of two equivalence tests for multiple standardized effects」主題。共同形成了獨特的指紋。