Explaining attitudinal ratings of Dutch rising contours: Morphological structure vs. the frequency code

T Rietveld*, J Haan, L Heijmans, Carlos Gussenhoven

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

In this article, two hypotheses were tested to explain attitudinal ratings like SURPRISE, SUGGESTION, REMINDER etc. of four rising nuclear contours observed in a Dutch question corpus and described as (a) H*L H%, (b) H* H%, (c) L*H H% and (d) L* H%. According to one hypothesis, the middle tones in (a) and (c) should be parcelled out, such that their absence produces contours (b) and (d), respectively, predicting col munality of meaning within (a, c) that excludes (b, d). That is, (b, d) could be viewed as undershot variants of (a, c), with undershoot expressing a shade of meaning different from that of the fully realised pitch accents. This hypothesis was not confirmed by the data, though. The other hypothesis was based on the concept of the 'frequency code', which associates high/rising F-0 values with non-assertive behaviour and appeared to provide a much better model to predict listeners' ratings. Copyright (C) 2002 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)180-194
Number of pages15
JournalPhonetica
Volume59
Issue number2-3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2002

Keywords

  • PITCH

Cite this