Estimation of a modified capability index for non-normal distributions http://compass.astm.org/download/JTE20150357.39078.pdf

W.l. Pearn, Y. T. Tai*, H. T. Wang

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

7 Scopus citations

Abstract

Process capability indices (PCIs), which are very important in quality control have been one of a numerical measure index in manufacturing processes. Index Cpk is the most popular one used in the manufacturing industry. It is applied under the assumption that the processes are normally distributed. In real-world applications, non-normal processes may occur in industries, and the index CNpk has been proposed for non-normal processes in which its exact sampling distribution is mathematically intractable. Quality practitioners commonly use the existing NCPPM (non-conformities in parts per million) table of Cpk to obtain process yields. However, the table could not be applied directly via the value of index CNpk. For the consistency of NCPPM mapping, we propose procedures to obtain the modified index CNpk and its approximately unbiased estimator ∼CNpk for three non-normal distributions, involving Log-normal, Gamma, and Weibull distributions. The values of modified index CNpk could be used to inquire the existing popular NCPPM table of Cpk. In addition, four bootstrap methods were used to construct the lower confidence bounds of the index CNpk, which are useful to the practitioners for making reliable decisions regarding process performance based on process yield.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1998-2009
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Testing and Evaluation
Volume44
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Sep 2016

Keywords

  • Lower confidence bound
  • Non-normal process
  • Process capability index
  • Surface fitting

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Estimation of a modified capability index for non-normal distributions http://compass.astm.org/download/JTE20150357.39078.pdf'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this