Does debt structure matter? Estimating contractor default barrier by the down-and-out call option approach

Yu-Lin Huang*, Wei Lin

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The down-and-out call option approach was used to analyse contractor financial risk under shorter-term debt structures. The maximum likelihood method was applied to estimate contractor default barriers and probabilities implied by stock prices series and actual debt maturities calculated from historical debt data. Results indicate that the default barriers implied by shorter-term debt structures are higher than previous estimates using longer-term debt structures. Further regression analysis shows that implied barriers do not reflect the full effects of asset quality in ameliorating financial distress. Hence, the implied default barriers tend to be higher than the actual default barriers. When applying the DOC approach, if the implied barrier is not calibrated to reflect the borrower's asset quality, the barrier will tend to overestimate default probability. This has important implications on contractor financial risk monitoring, security pricing and short-term financial planning.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)947-958
Number of pages12
JournalConstruction Management and Economics
Volume28
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - 23 Sep 2010

Keywords

  • Down-and-out call option
  • Financial planning
  • Financial risk
  • Maximum likelihood method
  • Regression analysis

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Does debt structure matter? Estimating contractor default barrier by the down-and-out call option approach'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this