TY - JOUR
T1 - Culture and the importance of usability attributes
AU - Wallace, Steve
AU - Reid, Adrian
AU - Clinciu, Daniel
AU - Kang, Jin-Su
PY - 2013/3/1
Y1 - 2013/3/1
N2 - Purpose: This study into cultural usability aims to identify whether the importance of usability attributes varied between nationalities, and whether this variance was related to cultural dimensions. Design/methodology/approach: A total of 144 subjects from four countries were surveyed on the importance they placed on the usability attributes of cell phones. Results were compared by country, and relationships with cultural dimensions were investigated. Findings: For each country, usability attributes were not rated equally. Across countries, no difference in the rating of effectiveness was found, while ratings of efficiency and satisfaction varied significantly. In addition, the study identified significant relationships between the importance given to efficiency and satisfaction and cultural dimensions identified by Hofstede and the World Values Survey, with values relating to task-orientation influencing efficiency, and non-task oriented values affecting the importance users place on satisfaction. Practical implications: Product designers and usability practitioners need to consider these cultural differences when designing products and when evaluating, measuring, and making recommendations on product usability. Originality/value: Previous studies in this area have shown the existence of differences in preference for usability attributes based on nationality. No studies known to the authors have connected this to cultural dimensions. Understanding of this connection supports usability practitioners in their work not just in specific countries but also in cultural regions. It also allows the more precise modeling by researchers of culture's interaction with usability.
AB - Purpose: This study into cultural usability aims to identify whether the importance of usability attributes varied between nationalities, and whether this variance was related to cultural dimensions. Design/methodology/approach: A total of 144 subjects from four countries were surveyed on the importance they placed on the usability attributes of cell phones. Results were compared by country, and relationships with cultural dimensions were investigated. Findings: For each country, usability attributes were not rated equally. Across countries, no difference in the rating of effectiveness was found, while ratings of efficiency and satisfaction varied significantly. In addition, the study identified significant relationships between the importance given to efficiency and satisfaction and cultural dimensions identified by Hofstede and the World Values Survey, with values relating to task-orientation influencing efficiency, and non-task oriented values affecting the importance users place on satisfaction. Practical implications: Product designers and usability practitioners need to consider these cultural differences when designing products and when evaluating, measuring, and making recommendations on product usability. Originality/value: Previous studies in this area have shown the existence of differences in preference for usability attributes based on nationality. No studies known to the authors have connected this to cultural dimensions. Understanding of this connection supports usability practitioners in their work not just in specific countries but also in cultural regions. It also allows the more precise modeling by researchers of culture's interaction with usability.
KW - Cultural dimensions
KW - Cultural usability
KW - Culture (sociology)
KW - Mobile communication systems
KW - Usability attributes
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84874792770&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1108/09593841311307150
DO - 10.1108/09593841311307150
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84874792770
VL - 26
SP - 77
EP - 93
JO - Information Technology and People
JF - Information Technology and People
SN - 0959-3845
IS - 1
ER -