A more accurate, reliable method to evaluate the photoelectrochemical performance of semiconductor electrode without under/over estimation

Jing Mei Li, Yu Ting Wang, Yung-Jung Hsu*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Scopus citations

Abstract

A more accurate and reliable method is proposed to evaluate the photoelectrochemical (PEC) performance of semiconductor toward water splitting. Conventionally, I-t measurements are conducted at a fixed potential relative to the reference electrode, e.g., 0 V vs. Ag/AgCl, to monitor the photocurrent, which has been regarded as a direct indicator for performance comparison among different electrodes. Considering that the open-circuit potential (OCP) varies from electrode to electrode, the photocurrent comparison at a fixed potential may misrepresent the actual differences between samples. Here, we study the PEC performance by applying two distinct external bias values, one at 0 V vs. Ag/AgCl deriving from the conventional practice and the other at 0.1 V vs. OCP representing the exactly fixed applied overpotential. Two experimental groups are designed to address the arguments, including the influence of heat treatment for ZnO nanorod arrays and the global comparison among ZnO, TiO 2 , Au particle-decorated TiO 2 , and CdS electrodes. Different trends in photocurrent are observed at the two distinct biases, with the results from 0.1 V vs. OCP conforming to the general considerations. The results suggest that application of a fixed potential relative to the OCP will provide a more fair comparison for accurate PEC performance evaluation without under- or over-estimation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)141-149
Number of pages9
JournalElectrochimica Acta
Volume267
DOIs
StatePublished - 20 Mar 2018

Keywords

  • 0 V vs. Ag/AgCl
  • Open-circuit potential
  • Photoelectrochemical water splitting
  • Zero-bias

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'A more accurate, reliable method to evaluate the photoelectrochemical performance of semiconductor electrode without under/over estimation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this