Abstract
This paper assesses two categories of partition techniques for computing terminal-pair reliability (pathbased and cut-based algorithms) by experimenting on published benchmarks; the criteria are the number of subproblems and the computation time. The cut-based algorithm is superior to the pathbased algorithm with respect to the computation time for most benchmarks. A refinement of the cut-based algorithm (using network reduction) profoundly outperforms the path-based algorithm (with reduction) for all benchmarks.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 413-416 |
Number of pages | 4 |
Journal | IEEE Transactions on Reliability |
Volume | 45 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 1 Dec 1996 |
Keywords
- Factoring
- Network reduction
- Partitioning
- Terminal-pair reliability